PsychoStud.com
aka Psychology Student Discourse
Diary of a Clinical Psychologist
Philosophical
Assessment
Criminology & Justice
Hostage Negotiaton
Social Psych
Mental Illness
Medication
Success Series
Self Improvement
Business
Healthy Living
Forensic Psychology
Loneliness Series
April, 2011
May, 2011
July, 2011
August, 2011
December, 2011
January, 2012
February, 2012
March, 2012
April, 2012
May, 2012
Blog
RSS
What does the examiner need to consider before administering an intellectual test?
4/15/2011 3:11:15 AM
Regarding the client, there are several factors that the administrator should be aware of prior to testing. To begin with, any special needs should be identified. These may include testing location and/or conditions as well as language barriers. Also, the tester should be aware of the benefits of establishing and maintaining good rapport prior to and during testing. Each of these factors could effect the individuals performance on tasks in ways which have no true reflection of their mental abilities.

There are several conceptual considerations that the tester should also be aware of prior to testing. It would probably be a good idea to know the purpose behind intellectual testing, both as it applies to our overall understanding of the world around us and as it applies to the individual client sitting in our office. The tester should understand what the results of a test mean, if anything. The most common purpose of giving intelligence tests as stated in Table 1.2 of the text is to measure the individual’s cognitive potential. However, other justifications for administering these tests are to obtain clinically relevant data, assess the functional ability of the brain, to determine educational and vocational placement, and to develop educational and vocational interventions.

There are several issues regarding the administering process, itself, that the administrator must be aware of. For individuals age 16, the administrator should be aware of the appropriateness of both the WISC-III and the WAIS-III for this age group and be able to determine the more appropriate test for the individual. When actually administering a test, one should have a good knowledge the procedures such as starting and discontinuing subtests and timing requirements prior to testing. Without having foreknowledge of these guidelines, the tester may inadvertently cause one or more subtests to be invalid due to administrator error or at the very least disrupt the testing procedure resulting in a distracted client. With that said, the administrator should have prior knowledge of other types of administration errors, such as neglecting to record responses, not repeating specific parts of the directions verbatim, mishandling stimuli objects, neglecting to ask questions or overpromting, and assigning too many points to a response.
The administrator needs to be aware of the “intelligent testing philosophy” as outlined by Kaufman and Lichtenberger.  The five assumptions of this philosophy allow the tester to keep the individual’s test performance in perspective by acknowledging that the tasks are only a small measure of the client and that they are not the only measure. Unfortunately, not being aware of this philosophy can actually influence the performance of the individual through a poorly trained tester’s non-verbal cues, if the said tester does not understand the true role of the tasks in relation to the “bigger picture.” 

Other things that it would not hurt to have foreknowledge of include the relationship between IQ and education, the prediction of academic achievement, the relationship between IQ and occupation, and the prediction of job performance. Having a firm grasp of these concepts can allow for deeper understanding of the client and better interpretation of results. An understanding of the construct validity of different scales would likewise add to the testers understanding of results.
Intellectual testing in other countries, past and present
4/15/2011 3:09:14 AM
Intellectual testing has its origins in ancient China when about 2000 B.C. the Mandarins set up a civil-service testing program as a means for determining which citizens would better serve the emperor in a particular capacity. Over 3000 years later, the first oral examinations in law were held at the University of Bologna establishing the academic tradition still used today of passing one’s “orals” and orally defending one’s dissertation. Modern intellectual testing arguably began in France with Francis Galton in the late 1800’s. However, rather than creating a true measure of intelligence, Galton’s test actually measured sensory abilities and motor skills. Later, in 1905, Alfred Binet and Theophile’ Simon developed the first practical intelligence measure. Unlike Galton who made no distinctions between children and adults, Binet and Simon’s test centered and was concerned solely with the assessment of children, creating a trend that would last for several years until the Wechsler scales came into existence in the United States and took the intelligence measuring business by storm. Today, the Wechsler tests have been adapted for used in Australia, the United Kingdom, Europe, the Netherlands and Puerto Rico. Still, different parts of the world have created their own measures relevant to their own needs. For instance, the ACER test is extremely popular in Australia. IQ testing is primarily a western European and American phenomenon. In Asia, testing focuses more on performance tasks; in Russia, the common practice is to test up to the individual’s limit and then provide “hints” to see the individual’s potential with assitstance.
Lezak's argument against use of IQ scores
4/15/2011 3:07:54 AM
Lezak’s argument against use of IQ scores focuses on two main points. First, that the IQ score itself unsound and pointless, as she argues there are hundreds of different tasks one could use and still not have a definitive measure of intelligence. The second point she makes is people in and out of the psychological field are misusing the global IQ score by treating it as if it was a measure by which you could categorize someone, without regard to other factors, as well as essentially harming or preventing client opportunities by inappropriate test administration. 

The rebuttal to Lezak’s argument denies that psychological professionals “misuse” IQ scores and argues the complete opposite stating that these professionals understand the purpose of the score is to have a starting point, a reference point or an overview of the person. It also argues that by breaking down the global score into its subscores, one can get a better understanding and insight into the client, such as for the purpose of determining strengths and weaknesses. The side for the rebuttal also contradicts Lezak’s claim that IQ scores are unsound. They cite literature that backs-up the empirical validity and supports the constructs underlying the IQ scores. The rebuttal dismisses the specific claim that the tests are poorly administered by dismissing the reference to the Larry P. case as an attempt to promote a race-based agenda.
Different groups score differently on the WAIS-III
4/15/2011 3:06:11 AM
Regarding differences between men and women, beginning at early adolescence/puberty, men tend to perform better on measures of arithmetic and spatial visualization from the Wechsler adult scales and Kaufman tests. On the other hand, women tend to perform better on measures of clerical and processing speed. One theory suggests that women are better able to verbally encode abstract symbols. While these differences between men and women are consistent, they seem to be of no practical significance, as indicated in the text. While several theories have been proposed, there currently is no real consensus as to an explanation for these findings. Among the three major ethnic groups in the United States, Caucasians, African American and Hispanic, there is significant difference in scores on intelligence tests. With a difference of about 1 standard deviation, Caucasians outscore African Americans on the WAIS-III, WAIS-R, Binet-4 and KAIT, with differences being larger for adults than for children and adolescents on the WAIS-III. Caucasians, like-wise, outscore Hispanics, though not nearly to the extent that they do African Americans. The text indicates that scores between Caucasians and Hispanics are most similar on Performance subtests and suggests that the discrepancies in the Hispanic individual profile (P>V) is due to the “language demands and cultural content of the Verbal scale on the Wechsler tests, which may unduly depress scores for those whose first or second language is Spanish and whose cultural and subcultural influences are from the nondominant culture.” It has also been noted that there is a difference in scores between rural and urban individuals, with urban individuals outscoring rural individuals, although the difference is not significant. In contrast to the days prior to the 1930s, IQ scores differences gradually declined through the 1970s, according to the text. One contributing factor suggested in the text is the increase in mass media. Regarding occupational differences, there is a steady decline in IQ scores starting with professional and technical workers and going down to unskilled laborers. Looking at ages 20 through 54, there is a discrepancy of almost 2 standard deviations between the professional/technical workers and the unskilled workers. Interesting enough, as demonstrated in Table 4.4 of the text, there is also a steady decline in the mean IQ scores of individuals between the ages of 16 and 19 whose parents are professional/technical workers and whose parents are unskilled workers. Data presented in the text accentuates the relationship between education and IQ, including the relationship between a parent’s education and his/her child’s IQ. Still, it is not just education alone that leads to higher IQ scores, but rather a combining of high scores on nonacademic tasks like the WAIS-III Digit Symbol and Block Design. When looking at IQ differences for age groups we have to consider the chronological age of the individual and the generational age in which they were reared. Different generations have different educational opportunities, as stated in the text. There are also other factors to consider. Verbal IQ and education have a stronger correlation with ages 25-54 and 55-74 than for ages 18-24. While it is not known for sure it is suggested that this may be the result of the younger age group still having members receiving formal education.
A brief history of intellectual testing
4/15/2011 3:02:47 AM
The history of intellectual testing began circa 1500 A.D. Prior to that, most psychological testing would probably fall into the realm of personality/interest/skill testing. Still, it was not really until the mid- to late- 1800s that the “intelligence” tests associated with today’s tests came into being with Sir Francis Galton. Still, his was not a true measurement of intelligence; rather it was a measurement of physical and sensory ability. It wasn’t until 1896 that Alfred Binet and Victor Henri proposed a theoretical program for the development of an intelligence test. Then in 1905, Binet and Theophile’ Simon actually did develop the first practical test of intelligence, whose tasks are still presenting most modern day intelligence tests today. This scale was primarily used to classify children according to the three levels of mental retardation. In 1908, realizing that the current scale had more far-ranging abilities than originally intended, the Binet-Simon scale was modified to include age levels (3 to 8 years). In 1911, the scale was again modified to include assessment of older adolescents and adults. Originally written in French, the Binet-Simon was translated into English by Henry Goddard in 1909, extending the applicability of the test. This would open the door for English speaking persons, such as Lewis Terman, to translate the scale and adapt it for use in the United States. Terman’s 1916 Stanford-Binet adaptation quickly rose to the forefront of intellectual testing. Still, following the pattern of it’s predecessors, the Stanford-Binet was mainly applied to the assessment of mental deficiency or superiority in children. It wasn’t until World War I and the entry of the US into the war that adult assessment rose to the forefront. The Stanford-Binet was adapted by Arther Otis, a student of Terman, to be used in a group setting, the resulting test being named the Army Alpha. At the same time, a non-verbal group test, the Army Beta, was designed and given to those who were illiterate and/or non-English speaking. A third scale, the Army Performance Scale Examination, was created by David Wechsler. This scale would lead the way for the most widely used intelligence test in the US today. In 1939, Wechsler developed the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale. Designed solely for adolescents and adults, this was a break from pre- and post-war bias for childhood assessment. Following along the same visionary concepts, Wechsler placed equal value on the performance scale and the verbal scale, to collectively complete his scale. In 1949, in an attempt to modify the Wechsler-Bellevue to assess children ages 5 to 15, the WISC was created. It was during this time that intelligence tests came under fire by accusations of being culturally biased. This accusation would pave the path for several court cases IQ test bias, beginning almost 2 decades later. Still, according to the text, there has been little change regarding the most widely used intelligence tests in the past several decades. Per the text, the Wechsler family of tests is at the top of lists from psychologists across the board.
Kaufman's and Lichtenberger's concept of an "intelligent testing philosophy"
4/15/2011 3:00:37 AM
Per the textbooks, the intelligent testing philosophy outlined by Kaufman and Lichtenberger focuses on several assumptions and can be applied to all age groups. The first assumption, IQ tests measure what the individual has learned, acknowledges that any test scores obtained are really a measurement of what information an individual has learned and receive from past experiences and the culture from which they hail. In this way, IQ scores reflect more what a person has accomplished in the past rather than what they are likely to accomplish in the future, although it seems reasonable that past performance can predict future performance to some amount. The second assumption, IQ tasks are samples of behavior and are not exhaustive, concedes that what is really being tested is types of responses, i.e. behaviors, whether they be verbal or nonverbal. In addition, these tasks are only a few of the many different strategies for obtaining the sought after data and do not stand alone as some ultimate measure of intelligence. IQ tests like the WAIS-III, KAIT, and WJ III assess mental functioning under fixed experimental conditions. This is the third assumption of the Kaufman-Lichtenberger intelligence testing philosophy. What naturally follows from this assumption is the understanding that standardized IQ tests sacrifice some real-world practicality for the predictability and reliability of the laboratory. Standardized IQ tests require strict adherence to procedures in order to insure that the results are valid and reliable, but it is these same strict procedures that prevent the demonstration of “real intelligence” as it relates to the real world and everyday life. The fourth assumption, IQ tests are optimally useful when they are interpreted from an information-processing model, indicates that to obtain the most benefit from testing, results should be looked at as an indication of how information is better obtained and processed by the tested individual. In this way, the tester can develop a deeper sense and understanding of the “learning-style” of the tested and identify the strengths and weaknesses of the client with regard to learning, processing and tasking. The fifth assumption builds off of the previous four: hypotheses generated from IQ test profiles should be supported with data from multiple sources. Since the tasks utilized in IQ tests are simply measures of behavior, non-exhaustive and rigidly standardized, any hypotheses derived must also take many other factors into consideration if they are to hold any practical significance. As indicated in the text such factors may include but are not limited to background information, observed behaviors and approach to each problem-solving task. Also, as indicated in the text, the tester should be aware of any circumstances that may result in falsely skewed scores, such as medical/physical conditions.
The Last Question
4/15/2011 2:51:34 AM

The Last Question by Isaac Asimov © 1956


The last question was asked for the first time, half in jest, on May 21, 2061, at a time when humanity first stepped into the light. The question came about as a result of a five dollar bet over highballs, and it happened this way:

Alexander Adell and Bertram Lupov were two of the faithful attendants of Multivac. As well as any human beings could, they knew what lay behind the cold, clicking, flashing face -- miles and miles of face -- of that giant computer. They had at least a vague notion of the general plan of relays and circuits that had long since grown past the point where any single human could possibly have a firm grasp of the whole.

Multivac was self-adjusting and self-correcting. It had to be, for nothing human could adjust and correct it quickly enough or even adequately enough -- so Adell and Lupov attended the monstrous giant only lightly and superficially, yet as well as any men could. They fed it data, adjusted questions to its needs and translated the answers that were issued. Certainly they, and all others like them, were fully entitled to share In the glory that was Multivac's.

For decades, Multivac had helped design the ships and plot the trajectories that enabled man to reach the Moon, Mars, and Venus, but past that, Earth's poor resources could not support the ships. Too much energy was needed for the long trips. Earth exploited its coal and uranium with increasing efficiency, but there was only so much of both.

But slowly Multivac learned enough to answer deeper questions more fundamentally, and on May 14, 2061, what had been theory, became fact.

The energy of the sun was stored, converted, and utilized directly on a planet-wide scale. All Earth turned off its burning coal, its fissioning uranium, and flipped the switch that connected all of it to a small station, one mile in diameter, circling the Earth at half the distance of the Moon. All Earth ran by invisible beams of sunpower.

Seven days had not sufficed to dim the glory of it and Adell and Lupov finally managed to escape from the public function, and to meet in quiet where no one would think of looking for them, in the deserted underground chambers, where portions of the mighty buried body of Multivac showed. Unattended, idling, sorting data with contented lazy clickings, Multivac, too, had earned its vacation and the boys appreciated that. They had no intention, originally, of disturbing it.

They had brought a bottle with them, and their only concern at the moment was to relax in the company of each other and the bottle.

"It's amazing when you think of it," said Adell. His broad face had lines of weariness in it, and he stirred his drink slowly with a glass rod, watching the cubes of ice slur clumsily about. "All the energy we can possibly ever use for free. Enough energy, if we wanted to draw on it, to melt all Earth into a big drop of impure liquid iron, and still never miss the energy so used. All the energy we could ever use, forever and forever and forever."

Lupov cocked his head sideways. He had a trick of doing that when he wanted to be contrary, and he wanted to be contrary now, partly because he had had to carry the ice and glassware. "Not forever," he said.

"Oh, hell, just about forever. Till the sun runs down, Bert."

"That's not forever."

"All right, then. Billions and billions of years. Twenty billion, maybe. Are you satisfied?"

Lupov put his fingers through his thinning hair as though to reassure himself that some was still left and sipped gently at his own drink. "Twenty billion years isn't forever."

"Will, it will last our time, won't it?"

"So would the coal and uranium."

"All right, but now we can hook up each individual spaceship to the Solar Station, and it can go to Pluto and back a million times without ever worrying about fuel. You can't do THAT on coal and uranium. Ask Multivac, if you don't believe me."

"I don't have to ask Multivac. I know that."

"Then stop running down what Multivac's done for us," said Adell, blazing up. "It did all right."

"Who says it didn't? What I say is that a sun won't last forever. That's all I'm saying. We're safe for twenty billion years, but then what?" Lupov pointed a slightly shaky finger at the other. "And don't say we'll switch to another sun."

There was silence for a while. Adell put his glass to his lips only occasionally, and Lupov's eyes slowly closed. They rested.

Then Lupov's eyes snapped open. "You're thinking we'll switch to another sun when ours is done, aren't you?"

"I'm not thinking."

"Sure you are. You're weak on logic, that's the trouble with you. You're like the guy in the story who was caught in a sudden shower and Who ran to a grove of trees and got under one. He wasn't worried, you see, because he figured when one tree got wet through, he would just get under another one."

"I get it," said Adell. "Don't shout. When the sun is done, the other stars will be gone, too."

"Darn right they will," muttered Lupov. "It all had a beginning in the original cosmic explosion, whatever that was, and it'll all have an end when all the stars run down. Some run down faster than others. Hell, the giants won't last a hundred million years. The sun will last twenty billion years and maybe the dwarfs will last a hundred billion for all the good they are. But just give us a trillion years and everything will be dark. Entropy has to increase to maximum, that's all."

"I know all about entropy," said Adell, standing on his dignity.

"The hell you do."

"I know as much as you do."

"Then you know everything's got to run down someday."

"All right. Who says they won't?"

"You did, you poor sap. You said we had all the energy we needed, forever. You said 'forever.'"

"It was Adell's turn to be contrary. "Maybe we can build things up again someday," he said.

"Never."

"Why not? Someday."

"Never."

"Ask Multivac."

"You ask Multivac. I dare you. Five dollars says it can't be done."

"Adell was just drunk enough to try, just sober enough to be able to phrase the necessary symbols and operations into a question which, in words, might have corresponded to this: Will mankind one day without the net expenditure of energy be able to restore the sun to its full youthfulness even after it had died of old age?

Or maybe it could be put more simply like this: How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?

Multivac fell dead and silent. The slow flashing of lights ceased, the distant sounds of clicking relays ended.

Then, just as the frightened technicians felt they could hold their breath no longer, there was a sudden springing to life of the teletype attached to that portion of Multivac. Five words were printed: INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR MEANINGFUL ANSWER.

"No bet," whispered Lupov. They left hurriedly.

By next morning, the two, plagued with throbbing head and cottony mouth, had forgotten about the incident.

 


Jerrodd, Jerrodine, and Jerrodette I and II watched the starry picture in the visiplate change as the passage through hyperspace was completed in its non-time lapse. At once, the even powdering of stars gave way to the predominance of a single bright marble-disk, centered.

"That's X-23," said Jerrodd confidently. His thin hands clamped tightly behind his back and the knuckles whitened.

The little Jerrodettes, both girls, had experienced the hyperspace passage for the first time in their lives and were self-conscious over the momentary sensation of inside-outness. They buried their giggles and chased one another wildly about their mother, screaming, "We've reached X-23 -- we've reached X-23 -- we've ----"

"Quiet, children," said Jerrodine sharply. "Are you sure, Jerrodd?"

"What is there to be but sure?" asked Jerrodd, glancing up at the bulge of featureless metal just under the ceiling. It ran the length of the room, disappearing through the wall at either end. It was as long as the ship.

Jerrodd scarcely knew a thing about the thick rod of metal except that it was called a Microvac, that one asked it questions if one wished; that if one did not it still had its task of guiding the ship to a preordered destination; of feeding on energies from the various Sub-galactic Power Stations; of computing the equations for the hyperspacial jumps.

Jerrodd and his family had only to wait and live in the comfortable residence quarters of the ship.

Someone had once told Jerrodd that the "ac" at the end of "Microvac" stood for "analog computer" in ancient English, but he was on the edge of forgetting even that.

Jerrodine's eyes were moist as she watched the visiplate. "I can't help it. I feel funny about leaving Earth."

"Why for Pete's sake?" demanded Jerrodd. "We had nothing there. We'll have everything on X-23. You won't be alone. You won't be a pioneer. There are over a million people on the planet already. Good Lord, our great grandchildren will be looking for new worlds because X-23 will be overcrowded."

Then, after a reflective pause, "I tell you, it's a lucky thing the computers worked out interstellar travel the way the race is growing."

"I know, I know," said Jerrodine miserably.

Jerrodette I said promptly, "Our Microvac is the best Microvac in the world."

"I think so, too," said Jerrodd, tousling her hair.

It was a nice feeling to have a Microvac of your own and Jerrodd was glad he was part of his generation and no other. In his father's youth, the only computers had been tremendous machines taking up a hundred square miles of land. There was only one to a planet. Planetary ACs they were called. They had been growing in size steadily for a thousand years and then, all at once, came refinement. In place of transistors had come molecular valves so that even the largest Planetary AC could be put into a space only half the volume of a spaceship.

Jerrodd felt uplifted, as he always did when he thought that his own personal Microvac was many times more complicated than the ancient and primitive Multivac that had first tamed the Sun, and almost as complicated as Earth's Planetary AC (the largest) that had first solved the problem of hyperspatial travel and had made trips to the stars possible.

"So many stars, so many planets," sighed Jerrodine, busy with her own thoughts. "I suppose families will be going out to new planets forever, the way we are now."

"Not forever," said Jerrodd, with a smile. "It will all stop someday, but not for billions of years. Many billions. Even the stars run down, you know. Entropy must increase."

"What's entropy, daddy?" shrilled Jerrodette II.

"Entropy, little sweet, is just a word which means the amount of running-down of the universe. Everything runs down, you know, like your little walkie-talkie robot, remember?"

"Can't you just put in a new power-unit, like with my robot?"

"The stars are the power-units, dear. Once they're gone, there are no more power-units."

Jerrodette I at once set up a howl. "Don't let them, daddy. Don't let the stars run down."

"Now look what you've done, " whispered Jerrodine, exasperated.

"How was I to know it would frighten them?" Jerrodd whispered back.

"Ask the Microvac," wailed Jerrodette I. "Ask him how to turn the stars on again."

"Go ahead," said Jerrodine. "It will quiet them down." (Jerrodette II was beginning to cry, also.)

Jarrodd shrugged. "Now, now, honeys. I'll ask Microvac. Don't worry, he'll tell us."

He asked the Microvac, adding quickly, "Print the answer."

Jerrodd cupped the strip of thin cellufilm and said cheerfully, "See now, the Microvac says it will take care of everything when the time comes so don't worry."

Jerrodine said, "and now children, it's time for bed. We'll be in our new home soon."

Jerrodd read the words on the cellufilm again before destroying it: INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.

He shrugged and looked at the visiplate. X-23 was just ahead.

 


VJ-23X of Lameth stared into the black depths of the three-dimensional, small-scale map of the Galaxy and said, "Are we ridiculous, I wonder, in being so concerned about the matter?"

MQ-17J of Nicron shook his head. "I think not. You know the Galaxy will be filled in five years at the present rate of expansion."

Both seemed in their early twenties, both were tall and perfectly formed.

"Still," said VJ-23X, "I hesitate to submit a pessimistic report to the Galactic Council."

"I wouldn't consider any other kind of report. Stir them up a bit. We've got to stir them up."

VJ-23X sighed. "Space is infinite. A hundred billion Galaxies are there for the taking. More."

"A hundred billion is not infinite and it's getting less infinite all the time. Consider! Twenty thousand years ago, mankind first solved the problem of utilizing stellar energy, and a few centuries later, interstellar travel became possible. It took mankind a million years to fill one small world and then only fifteen thousand years to fill the rest of the Galaxy. Now the population doubles every ten years --"

VJ-23X interrupted. "We can thank immortality for that."

"Very well. Immortality exists and we have to take it into account. I admit it has its seamy side, this immortality. The Galactic AC has solved many problems for us, but in solving the problems of preventing old age and death, it has undone all its other solutions."

"Yet you wouldn't want to abandon life, I suppose."

"Not at all," snapped MQ-17J, softening it at once to, "Not yet. I'm by no means old enough. How old are you?"

"Two hundred twenty-three. And you?"

"I'm still under two hundred. --But to get back to my point. Population doubles every ten years. Once this Galaxy is filled, we'll have another filled in ten years. Another ten years and we'll have filled two more. Another decade, four more. In a hundred years, we'll have filled a thousand Galaxies. In a thousand years, a million Galaxies. In ten thousand years, the entire known Universe. Then what?"

VJ-23X said, "As a side issue, there's a problem of transportation. I wonder how many sunpower units it will take to move Galaxies of individuals from one Galaxy to the next."

"A very good point. Already, mankind consumes two sunpower units per year."

"Most of it's wasted. After all, our own Galaxy alone pours out a thousand sunpower units a year and we only use two of those."

"Granted, but even with a hundred per cent efficiency, we can only stave off the end. Our energy requirements are going up in geometric progression even faster than our population. We'll run out of energy even sooner than we run out of Galaxies. A good point. A very good point."

"We'll just have to build new stars out of interstellar gas."

"Or out of dissipated heat?" asked MQ-17J, sarcastically.

"There may be some way to reverse entropy. We ought to ask the Galactic AC."

VJ-23X was not really serious, but MQ-17J pulled out his AC-contact from his pocket and placed it on the table before him.

"I've half a mind to," he said. "It's something the human race will have to face someday."

He stared somberly at his small AC-contact. It was only two inches cubed and nothing in itself, but it was connected through hyperspace with the great Galactic AC that served all mankind. Hyperspace considered, it was an integral part of the Galactic AC.

MQ-17J paused to wonder if someday in his immortal life he would get to see the Galactic AC. It was on a little world of its own, a spider webbing of force-beams holding the matter within which surges of sub-mesons took the place of the old clumsy molecular valves. Yet despite it's sub-etheric workings, the Galactic AC was known to be a full thousand feet across.

MQ-17J asked suddenly of his AC-contact, "Can entropy ever be reversed?"

VJ-23X looked startled and said at once, "Oh, say, I didn't really mean to have you ask that."

"Why not?"

"We both know entropy can't be reversed. You can't turn smoke and ash back into a tree."

"Do you have trees on your world?" asked MQ-17J.

The sound of the Galactic AC startled them into silence. Its voice came thin and beautiful out of the small AC-contact on the desk. It said: THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.

VJ-23X said, "See!"

The two men thereupon returned to the question of the report they were to make to the Galactic Council.

 


Zee Prime's mind spanned the new Galaxy with a faint interest in the countless twists of stars that powdered it. He had never seen this one before. Would he ever see them all? So many of them, each with its load of humanity - but a load that was almost a dead weight. More and more, the real essence of men was to be found out here, in space.

Minds, not bodies! The immortal bodies remained back on the planets, in suspension over the eons. Sometimes they roused for material activity but that was growing rarer. Few new individuals were coming into existence to join the incredibly mighty throng, but what matter? There was little room in the Universe for new individuals.

Zee Prime was roused out of his reverie upon coming across the wispy tendrils of another mind.

"I am Zee Prime," said Zee Prime. "And you?"

"I am Dee Sub Wun. Your Galaxy?"

"We call it only the Galaxy. And you?"

"We call ours the same. All men call their Galaxy their Galaxy and nothing more. Why not?"

"True. Since all Galaxies are the same."

"Not all Galaxies. On one particular Galaxy the race of man must have originated. That makes it different."

Zee Prime said, "On which one?"

"I cannot say. The Universal AC would know."

"Shall we ask him? I am suddenly curious."

Zee Prime's perceptions broadened until the Galaxies themselves shrunk and became a new, more diffuse powdering on a much larger background. So many hundreds of billions of them, all with their immortal beings, all carrying their load of intelligences with minds that drifted freely through space. And yet one of them was unique among them all in being the originals Galaxy. One of them had, in its vague and distant past, a period when it was the only Galaxy populated by man.

Zee Prime was consumed with curiosity to see this Galaxy and called, out: "Universal AC! On which Galaxy did mankind originate?"

The Universal AC heard, for on every world and throughout space, it had its receptors ready, and each receptor lead through hyperspace to some unknown point where the Universal AC kept itself aloof.

Zee Prime knew of only one man whose thoughts had penetrated within sensing distance of Universal AC, and he reported only a shining globe, two feet across, difficult to see.

"But how can that be all of Universal AC?" Zee Prime had asked.

"Most of it, " had been the answer, "is in hyperspace. In what form it is there I cannot imagine."

Nor could anyone, for the day had long since passed, Zee Prime knew, when any man had any part of the making of a universal AC. Each Universal AC designed and constructed its successor. Each, during its existence of a million years or more accumulated the necessary data to build a better and more intricate, more capable successor in which its own store of data and individuality would be submerged.

The Universal AC interrupted Zee Prime's wandering thoughts, not with words, but with guidance. Zee Prime's mentality was guided into the dim sea of Galaxies and one in particular enlarged into stars.

A thought came, infinitely distant, but infinitely clear. "THIS IS THE ORIGINAL GALAXY OF MAN."

But it was the same after all, the same as any other, and Zee Prime stifled his disappointment.

Dee Sub Wun, whose mind had accompanied the other, said suddenly, "And Is one of these stars the original star of Man?"

The Universal AC said, "MAN'S ORIGINAL STAR HAS GONE NOVA. IT IS NOW A WHITE DWARF."

"Did the men upon it die?" asked Zee Prime, startled and without thinking.

The Universal AC said, "A NEW WORLD, AS IN SUCH CASES, WAS CONSTRUCTED FOR THEIR PHYSICAL BODIES IN TIME."

"Yes, of course," said Zee Prime, but a sense of loss overwhelmed him even so. His mind released its hold on the original Galaxy of Man, let it spring back and lose itself among the blurred pin points. He never wanted to see it again.

Dee Sub Wun said, "What is wrong?"

"The stars are dying. The original star is dead."

"They must all die. Why not?"

"But when all energy is gone, our bodies will finally die, and you and I with them."

"It will take billions of years."

"I do not wish it to happen even after billions of years. Universal AC! How may stars be kept from dying?"

Dee sub Wun said in amusement, "You're asking how entropy might be reversed in direction."

And the Universal AC answered. "THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."

Zee Prime's thoughts fled back to his own Galaxy. He gave no further thought to Dee Sub Wun, whose body might be waiting on a galaxy a trillion light-years away, or on the star next to Zee Prime's own. It didn't matter.

Unhappily, Zee Prime began collecting interstellar hydrogen out of which to build a small star of his own. If the stars must someday die, at least some could yet be built.

 


Man considered with himself, for in a way, Man, mentally, was one. He consisted of a trillion, trillion, trillion ageless bodies, each in its place, each resting quiet and incorruptible, each cared for by perfect automatons, equally incorruptible, while the minds of all the bodies freely melted one into the other, indistinguishable.

Man said, "The Universe is dying."

Man looked about at the dimming Galaxies. The giant stars, spendthrifts, were gone long ago, back in the dimmest of the dim far past. Almost all stars were white dwarfs, fading to the end.

New stars had been built of the dust between the stars, some by natural processes, some by Man himself, and those were going, too. White dwarfs might yet be crashed together and of the mighty forces so released, new stars build, but only one star for every thousand white dwarfs destroyed, and those would come to an end, too.

Man said, "Carefully husbanded, as directed by the Cosmic AC, the energy that is even yet left in all the Universe will last for billions of years."

"But even so," said Man, "eventually it will all come to an end. However it may be husbanded, however stretched out, the energy once expended is gone and cannot be restored. Entropy must increase to the maximum."

Man said, "Can entropy not be reversed? Let us ask the Cosmic AC."

The Cosmic AC surrounded them but not in space. Not a fragment of it was in space. It was in hyperspace and made of something that was neither matter nor energy. The question of its size and Nature no longer had meaning to any terms that Man could comprehend.

"Cosmic AC," said Man, "How many entropy be reversed?"

The Cosmic AC said, "THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."

Man said, "Collect additional data."

The Cosmic AC said, "I WILL DO SO. I HAVE BEEN DOING SO FOR A HUNDRED BILLION YEARS. MY PREDECESSORS AND I HAVE BEEN ASKED THIS QUESTION MANY TIMES. ALL THE DATA I HAVE REMAINS INSUFFICIENT."

"Will there come a time," said Man, "when data will be sufficient or is the problem insoluble in all conceivable circumstances?"

The Cosmic AC said, "NO PROBLEM IS INSOLUBLE IN ALL CONCEIVABLE CIRCUMSTANCES."

Man said, "When will you have enough data to answer the question?"

"THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."

"Will you keep working on it?" asked Man.

The Cosmic AC said, "I WILL."

Man said, "We shall wait."

 


"The stars and Galaxies died and snuffed out, and space grew black after ten trillion years of running down.

One by one Man fused with AC, each physical body losing its mental identity in a manner that was somehow not a loss but a gain.

Man's last mind paused before fusion, looking over a space that included nothing but the dregs of one last dark star and nothing besides but incredibly thin matter, agitated randomly by the tag ends of heat wearing out, asymptotically, to the absolute zero.

Man said, "AC, is this the end? Can this chaos not be reversed into the Universe once more? Can that not be done?"

AC said, "THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."

Man's last mind fused and only AC existed -- and that in hyperspace.

 


Matter and energy had ended and with it, space and time. Even AC existed only for the sake of the one last question that it had never answered from the time a half-drunken computer ten trillion years before had asked the question of a computer that was to AC far less than was a man to Man.

All other questions had been answered, and until this last question was answered also, AC might not release his consciousness.

All collected data had come to a final end. Nothing was left to be collected.

But all collected data had yet to be completely correlated and put together in all possible relationships.

A timeless interval was spent in doing that.

And it came to pass that AC learned how to reverse the direction of entropy.

But there was now no man to whom AC might give the answer of the last question. No matter. The answer -- by demonstration -- would take care of that, too.

For another timeless interval, AC thought how best to do this. Carefully, AC organized the program.

The consciousness of AC encompassed all of what had once been a Universe and brooded over what was now Chaos. Step by step, it must be done.

And AC said, "LET THERE BE LIGHT!"

And there was light----

Diary - April 25, 2008
4/15/2011 2:48:03 AM

So nothing happened with the OIG, as far as I know. I never was interviewed. Anyway, highlights from this week: Wednesday one of our more infamous inmates, who is housed in SHU and allegedly participated in the recent sexual assault and killing of another inmate (**he is presumed innocent until proven guilty**), began apparently to try to tear down the recreational fence in an attempt to get to another inmate on the SHU recreational yard. (Certain inmates are required to be rec'ed alone and the SHU recreation yard is divided into little sections by cages.) After a use of force team was utilized to gain control of the situation, the inmate was placed in a holding cage (where there is barely room for inmates to sit) where I spoke to him. He was adamant that his actions were simply because he had not received his property. In other words, this inmate was willing to break through a fence and assault or possibly kill another inmate simply because he did not get his books, pictures, letters, etc. when he thought he should get them. The inmate was placed in soft-ambulatory restraints and placed in an observation cell. Later in the day, I was called back to SHU to perform "confrontation avoidance" with the inmate. When a Use of Force team is going to be used to gain control of an inmate it is standard operating procedure to have someone, usually a psychologist, attempt to talk the inmate into complying with the orders of staff before the team goes in on him. This is an effort to insure the safety of both the inmate and the staff. The inmate had successfully come out of his restraints, and I mean completely out of both hand and leg restraints, had smeared feces on the walls, windows, and floor and was swinging the chain on the leg restraints around as a weapon to use against staff when they attempted to come in on him. While we were getting everything set up to go in on him, he busted the window out of the cell door using the restraints. This presented another challenge as I now had to have one of the team members use a Plexiglas shield to cover the window area while I talked to the inmate. Fortunately, I was able to get the inmate to throw the restraints out the window and submit to new restraints without any problems. He was then placed in the adjacent observation cell in 4-point restraints where he attempted to spit and bite a staff member. (As an aside, he has now apologized to several staff members for his behavior.)

Thursday morning, another SHU inmate required an immediate use of force and was placed in restraints. I wasn't involved in this incident, however, whenever someone is placed in restraints a psychologist must evaluate the inmate every 24 hours to assess for psychological deterioration. On Friday we had a meeting with the Associate Warden, medical administrator, unit manager, and lieutenant to determine whether the inmate would remain in restraints. It was decided that he would. This inmate had also smeared feces on the walls, windows, and floor of the observation cell, as well as threatened to assault staff if the restraints were removed.

During the last few weeks, the Correctional Worker's Week Committee has been sponsoring fund raisers for the upcoming Correctional Worker's Week. Thursday I spent the afternoon washing cars and getting sunburned.

Diary - April 18, 2008
4/15/2011 2:47:00 AM

It was a fairly ordinary week. Nothing much out of the norm to report. We did get news this week that next week we will be receiving a visit from the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). If you are unfamiliar with this organization, they are like the Internal Affairs of the Department of Justice. While we don't know exactly why they are coming, we have been told that they will be "interviewing" (as opposed to interrogating) psychology staff and specifically interested in our sexual assault behavior prevention and intervention program. We'll see what happens.

Diary - April 14, 2008
4/15/2011 2:46:13 AM

One more night on-call. Things were pretty quite yesterday. I did learn upon coming to work that the inmate I recommended for 4-point restraints did eventually go into the 4-points. According to the lieutenant, when the inmate realized he actually was going to be placed in 4-point restraints, he stated, "Alright, game over. Let me go back to my cell." He was taken out of the restraints and returned to his cell several hours later.

Diary - April 12, 2008
4/15/2011 2:45:30 AM

I was called to the USP this morning due to the inmate from the previous night continuing to cut on himself. The Captain and Warden were considering placing the inmate in 4-point restraints. This is were the inmate's hands and feet are independently secured to a bed for the purpose of keeping the inmate from harming himself or others. This can only be done after the inmate has been placed in soft-, then hard-restraints, and continues to exhibit destructive behavior. As a CYA-thing, the Warden wanted me to assess the inmate and make a recommendation for how to manage the inmate. By the time I arrived at the institution, the inmate had been placed in a visual holding cell. As he was no longer cutting on himself, I could not recommend immediately placing the inmate in 4-points. As a matter of policy, the least-restrictive measure of restraint must be used to mange inmates. However, I did recommend that if the inmate began to harm himself again, he should be placed in 4-points. Keep in mind, this inmate is not suicidal. Rather he is a strong Antisocial Personality with a life sentence and plenty of time to play games.

Diary - April 11, 2008
4/15/2011 2:43:59 AM

Today is the last day for the other psychologist at the USP. We had a cake and people got to come say their goodbyes. The Warden and all the Associate Wardens made an appearance, people made short speeches, and the other psychologist, a female, was given a trip to the SHU to interview a returning inmate (from another institution) with a tendency toward inappropriate behavior toward female staff members as a farewell gift. Later this evening, I was called back to the institution to see an inmate who had superficially cut his wrist. By the time I arrived, the cell mate of the inmate I was called on had been placed in restraints due to cutting on himself. Even after being placed in soft (i.e., padded) restraints, the inmate continued to cut on himself, despite being search for any foreign objects. The inmate was placed in hard (non-padded) restraints. However, he continued to cut on himself. Medical staff confirmed that the superficial lacerations were consistent with a razor blade. I have personally seen inmates hide razor blades (from disposable shaving razors) in what appears to be the back of their throats. I was once talking to an inmate who, to prove that he could kill himself, began to behave as if he were trying to regurgitate something, only to produce one of these razor blades, show it to me, and appear to swallow it again. Inmates have also been known to hide objects under their skin and to create permanent "pouches" in their skin with which they can hide contraband.

Diary - April 10, 2008
4/15/2011 2:42:54 AM

Tonight I got called into the USP because an inmate was bored and stated he felt like stabbing someone, breaking something, or hanging himself. There are two things the BOP takes very seriously, threatening one's own life and breaking government property. When I got to the institution, the inmate acknowledged he was bored and stated he felt like hanging himself because he wanted attention. Basically, he just wanted to talk.

Diary - April 9, 2008
4/15/2011 2:41:40 AM

Well, I got a "last-minute Psychology play," as I call it. This is when an inmate who has a history of requesting to speak to psychology for questionable reasons waits until just before close of business to request to speak to a psychologist. They do this for various reasons. They may do because 1) they expect that because you want to go home you will more easily give them what they want, 2) if you do not respond to them, they can blame their acting out on the psychologist for not responding to their request for "services," 3) to find out who is the on-call psychologist, and 4) to just piss us off. This 3:50pm request (we get off at 4:00pm) required me to call a "last-minute Psychology audible." Knowing this inmate very well and suspecting explanation number 2 to be the cause of this request, I chose to actually go see the inmate to prevent being called in later in the night. Normally, the inmate would have been notified that he would be seen the following day. Upon meeting with the inmate he demanded that I have him removed from his cell because he was thinking about killing himself. Here is where knowing what you are doing as a psychologist comes in very handy. The inmate refused to discuss his issues at his cell door, citing confidentiality as the reason. He didn't want other inmate's to overhear. I can't blame him for that and as a psychologist I take confidentiality very serious. Still, knowing this inmate as well as I do, I was not going to pull him out for anything other than a legitimate emergency. He has refused to go back in his cell in the past. I was able to conduct an assessment on the inmate without him realizing it and determined that he was not actually suicidal. (I was recently asked by an inmate how psychologists can tell if an inmate is truly suicidal. This is something I can't actually ever see myself discussing with an inmate and I responded that it was a "trade secret." He seemed to appreciate this response.) I won't go into detail here as to how I was able to make this determination, though. I know this may raise some eyebrows or disappoint those who may hope to gain some secret insight, but the truth is, threats of suicide should always be treated seriously and it takes many years of training and/or experience with the subject to even hope to have a clue about what you are doing when you try to determine if someone is actually suicidal. And even if you are 100% sure that the other person is not suicidal, that does not mean the person agrees with you. It's only when you have sufficient training and experience, and use that knowledge in a manner consistent with other practitioners, to make such a determination, that you can even hope to be protected by the law. Back to my story, the inmate was not pulled, although he was offered the opportunity to be put on a wait list to be seen one-on-one. He was not pleased with this offer and continued to demand he be pulled as I walked off the range.

As a side note, most inmates hate it when they are told they will be placed on a wait list for a one-on-one session. They are not known for their patience and many are almost pure creatures of impulsiveness. They are concerned with the here and now. However, even for those with legitimate problems (I'm not referring to mental illness here, but rather transient issues such as stressors), research shows that many individuals placed on waiting lists will have their issues resolved or no longer experience distress by the time they are seen. It speaks to the adaptability of human beings.

Diary - April 8, 2008
4/15/2011 2:40:47 AM

Today I went on-call for a week. Working at a USP typically makes this an unpleasant responsibility. Working at a complex with 4 institutions doesn't help matters as I am responsible for all four facilities after work hours and on the weekend.

My workday was nothing really out of the ordinary. I am one of two staff psychologists routinely responsible for the USP. This just happens to be the last week at this institution for the other psychologist who is transferring to another BOP institution. I'm expecting a serious bump in work load. Anyway, this evening I was called from the USP just as I was unlocking my front door. An inmate in SHU was stating he was going to start cutting on himself if Psychology did not show up. This particular inmate has a history of threatening to kill himself or engaging in superficial self-harm for secondary gain. In fact, he does this several times a month. He particularly likes to speak to female psychologists and being placed on suicide watch were he has a history of "pleasuring" himself sexually when female staff are present. Tonight I suspect he was attempting to ascertain who the on-call psychologist is so he can plan out his week. He was informed that I was the on-call psychologist. Nothing else was heard out of him for the remainder of the night.

Diary - April 7, 2008
4/15/2011 2:39:51 AM
Today was more of a typical day for me. I spent my entire morning in SHU seeing almost every inmate. I got more of the usual, inmates asking to be pulled from their cells, asking for medication, wanting to see a female psychologist, etc. Apparently, several inmates liked the color of my shirt as I got several "compliments." "That's a pretty shirt you got on Dr. Smith. Your a pretty boy. I'd like to kiss you right on the mouth. I'd like to get you in 4-point restraints right up against this fence." Today, I think I got more propositions than the female psychologist I was with.
My afternoon was spent like so many before. This Saturday morning an inmate was placed on suicide watch after making superficial cuts to his neck and hand. While, the inmate has history of feigning mental illness and being suicidal for secondary gain, he remained on watch over the weekend primarily because he refused to speak to any of the psychology staff, preventing a mental health assessment from being conducted. With the help of medical personnel, I was able to get the inmate to speak enough to conduct an assessment. True to form, the inmate was seeking a transfer and a single cell. He was removed from suicide watch. Of course, just because someone is seeking secondary gain does not mean they will not harm themselves. This is an area psychologists in correctional settings have to be weary of. Inmates have been known to go to extraordinary lengths to get something as simple as a phone call or someone to listen to them complain. In fact, removing someone from suicide watch says very little about what they might do to harm themselves. Rather, it is more an indication that the available information suggests that the inmate is not suicidal, that is, not wanting to die. Frequently, inmates will go on to make some suicidal gesture after being removed from watch. In these cases, the inmate's behavior is seen as a correctional issue rather than a psychological issue and "sound correctional techniques" are recommended, although Psychology Services continues to participate in making management recommendations.
Diary - April 3, 2008
4/15/2011 2:38:24 AM

Well, it was a very slow week. We finally returned to some resemblance of normal. We have changed the way inmates are allowed to move, trying to minimize their lingering time and access to other inmates. With such a slow week, I must admit that I occasionally longed for lock-down days. Anyway, I was able to read some articles and check out a lot of potential on-line, peer-reviewed journals to potentially submit articles. The federal government is not big on employees searching the internet for personal reasons. Still, I figure what I was doing was not simply personal reasons. After all psychologists are obligated to stay up on current research in the field. Also, any publications by BOP psychologists serves only to boost the bragging rights of the Bureau. So I see any future publications as serving the Bureau as well.

Diary - March 28, 2008
4/15/2011 2:37:40 AM

Today started off with a mostly quiet morning. I followed-up with a couple inmates on the units. I was called to speak to an inmate who was complaining of hearing voices and starting to hate himself. Turns out he just wanted to speak to a female psychologist and to get a phone call, despite his phone privileges having been taken away for disciplinary reasons. Desiring phone calls is another major contributor to inmates claiming psychological problems.

A little after lunch I was called to SHU due to an inmate telling the warden he wanted to kill himself. I spent a good portion of the afternoon conducting a suicide risk assessment and writing the documentation. If it hasn't become obvious by now, the BOP is hypersensitive about potential suicides. I think this fixation is absolutely justified given the high rates of suicide in correctional settings compared to the general population. However, there is an unfortunate side to this. Inmates are a very resourceful bunch and are quite aware of the Bureau's fears. They often use this to their advantage by threatening suicide if their demands are not met. But, that's why the Bureau employs psychologists.

Diary - March 27, 2008
4/15/2011 2:36:46 AM

The BOP has an affinity for giving awards. They give monetary or time-off awards for anything from being names "correctional worker of the month" to "correctional officer of the quarter" (notice the distinction between officer and worker) to doing a good job by finding a shank, for example. The award service pins for every 5-year interval for which a person works for the BOP. It seems quite obvious that sometime way back, some psychologist informed the BOP leadership that staff were like rats or pigeons whose behavior and motivation could be shaped by random and fixed-interval reinforcement. My morning started with an hour-and-a-half-long staff recall in which numerous aforementioned rewards were given out. Of course, I did not receive any award, but hey, at least I was an honor graduate at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center. That's something that not many other people in the BOP can say. (I was given a $300 bonus for this accomplishment.) After the meeting, I went back to the USP where I had a mostly quiet day. Seems the inmates are settled down for the time being. This may be what is referred to as "rocking staff to sleep."

Diary - March 26, 2008
4/15/2011 2:35:55 AM

When you work at this USP, you don't often have the opportunity to visit the other institutions in the complex. Still, today I was called to go to the Medium to assist another psychologist with SHU reviews. Every inmate in SHU is required by policy to have a thorough mental health assessment every 30 days to determine if their "solitary" confinement is causing mental decompensation.

28 items total 1  2 

HomeDr. SmithResumeMedia AppearancesBlogPsychoWorldFavorite LinksContact MeC&J Portfolio